Translate

Sunday, November 30, 2014

Gizmodo- Fans React to Star Wars Trailer, Make Their Own

Fan-Made The Force Awakens Trailers Show Signs of Prequel PTSD

Fan-Made The Force Awakens Trailers Show Signs of Prequel PTSD
Unless you were five years old or particularly interested in intergalactic trade negotiations, Star Wars' return to cinemas 15 years ago was most likely an underwhelming experience. In fact, you may find it hard to trust any Star Wars film ever again. Don't worry, you're not alone.
The new Star Wars: The Force Awakens trailer has been picked apart, analyzed, and Lego-ified. The teaser already reached 27 million views on YouTube alone and it's only been on the internet for two days. But a new crop of fan tributes show that J.J. Abrams and the Star Wars franchise are going to have to do a lot more turn earn some fans' trust than releasing a flashy 88-second teaser.
In this first trailer, YouTube user TimTimFed postulates what would happen if the new Star Wars film was given the good ole George Lucas Special Edition treatment. The results feature a lot of random CGI shoved into scenes where they don't belong and a completely insane take on that already controversial new lightsaber.
However, this second trailer is more of a warning as it's cryptic title, Star Wars: The Phantom Awakens, would dictate. Splicing together The Force Awakens audio with scenes from 1999's The Phantom Menace, this trailer is a little more rough around the edges, but it soberly reminds us that really, really awesome trailers can simply hide really, really terrible films. Although The Force Awakens already looks better than the prequels, that's not really saying much.
But not all trailers are completely doom and gloom. One particular YouTube genius already had the inevitable idea to create The Force Awakens in the comedic style of Mel Brooks, and it's about as great as you'd expect. [Reddit/YouTube]
1 76Reply
With that ranking, do I guess right in that you're too young to have seen the first three (IV-VI) in the theaters, unmodified?
My ranking: V, IV, VI, CS
There are no episodes I-III. IV was an arbitrary number added to the rolling texts of the movie to make the audience feel more like they had been dropped into something, so they could write the famous low angle scrolling text as a recap and drop you into the middle of a space battle.
I think Phantom Menace could have been a great movie if it were edited correctly.
The first half hour of the movie didn't need to exist.
R2-D2 should have been the lovable sidekick, not Jar Jar.
Qui-gon should have been the main hero, not the mish-mash of other characters.
Darth Maul should have been the main villain, directing everything instead of the trade-council people.
Young Skywalker REALLY should have been more of the silent, shy type. (no YIPPEEE for me)

These minor changes would have made it a pretty decent movie.

Let's change the narrative. There's a TON of people who love the PT, and even more who at the very least appreciate what those films offered. Many of those people are in their mid-twenties already, which means all of these news articles from endless journalists in their 30's and 40's that have to slip in some jab at the prequels (you would not believe how many articles about this very trailer have included the words "thankfully it looks nothing like the prequels!!1!") are actually insulting the tastes of a significant portion of their readership.
Enjoying the prequels doesn't make you less of an elite Star Wars fan, it doesn't make you an idiot, and it no longer means you're probably a child. It means you enjoy clone troopers and the Jedi Order and Naboo and Coruscant just as much as you enjoy X Wings and the Death Star.
I think it has become a matter of historical record that while most Star Wars fans watched the prequels, they also thought them widely inferior to the O.G. movies and extremely disappointing, so I actually think that journos and bloggers who repeat things like, "thankfully it looks nothing like the prequels!!1!" are merely stating a widely accepted fact. It's not as if that phrase is controversial at this point.

No comments:

Post a Comment