Translate

Saturday, November 29, 2014

Scientific American- World Population to Soar

See InsideScientific American Volume 311, Issue 6

World Population Will Soar Higher Than Predicted

World population will hit nearly 11 billion by 2100
Hana Ševčíková and Jen Christiansen; SOURCES: “WORLD POPULATION STABILIZATION UNLIKELY THIS CENTURY,” BY PATRICK GERLAND ET AL., IN SCIENCE EXPRESS. PUBLISHED ONLINE SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 (2014 projections); “THE END OF WORLD POPULATION GROWTH,” BY WOLFGANG LUTZ ET AL., IN NATURE, VOL. 412; AUGUST 2, 2001 (2001 projections)

United Nations leaders have worried for decades about the pace of population growth. A few years ago leading calculations had global population peaking at nine billion by 2070 and then easing to 8.4 billion by 2100. Currently it stands at 7.2 billion. Recently the U.N. revised these numbers steeply upward: the population is now expected to rise to 9.6 billion by 2050 and continue to 10.9 billion by 2100 (black line, below). What caused this drastic revision? Almost all the increase comes from Africa (pink line). Earlier models “had anticipated that fertility rates in Africa would drop quickly, but they haven’t,” says Adrian Raftery, a statistician at the University of Washington, who assessed the revised estimates. How the world will feed a few billion more people is the question of the day.  
          
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN ONLINE
For data on ratios of workers to retirees, see ScientificAmerican.com/dec2014/graphic-science
This article was originally published with the title "Up, Up and Away."
Share this Article:

Comments

ChrysesNovember 27, 2014, 11:32 AM
... thus lowering even further the likelihood that the more severe impacts of AGW can be avoided.
Report as Abuse | 
 
Link to This
Tony MarshallsayNovember 28, 2014, 7:18 AM
Where are you, Bertrand Zobrist?
Report as Abuse | 
 
Link to This
openeyes999November 28, 2014, 12:38 PM
While it will be a challenge to feed this many people, I think we will be able to handle it. First, if we were forced to go vegetarian we could almost feed that many people right now. Plus, in the current system there's a lot of waste which could be reduced by current technology and better practices.
Also, in the future our technology will more advanced. I know people are afraid of GM crops but half the world would starve without them and they have a good safety record. Organic crops will increasingly only be possible for the rich. In any case, it's just another reason to invest more $ in biotech than we already do.
Additionally, there are many good food sources people don't use. (Ex: kelp, insects)
Interesting question...would people's reactions be different if the population increase was coming from Europe instead of Africa?
Report as Abuse | 
 
Link to This
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Scientific American Holiday Sale

Black Friday/Cyber Monday Blow-Out Sale

Enter code:
HOLIDAY 2014
at checkout
X

No comments:

Post a Comment